Kontrastivní lingvistika a paralelní korpusy
Contrastive Linguistics and Parallel Corpora
Vědecký článek
View/ Open
Permanent link
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11956/97214Identifiers
Collections
- Číslo 2 [15]
Author
Issue Date
2017Publisher
Univerzita Karlova, Filozofická fakultaPraha
Source document
Časopis pro moderní filologii (Journal for Modern Philology) (web)ISSN: 2336-6591
Periodical publication year: 2017
Periodical Volume: 2017
Periodical Issue: 2
Link to license terms
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/Keywords (Czech)
paralelní korpusy, kontrastivní lingvistika, překladové protějšky, nominální tendence, aktuální členění větnéKeywords (English)
parallel corpora, contrastive linguistics, translation counterparts, nominal tendencies, functional sentence perspectiveThe article presents a brief survey of English-Czech contrastive studies based on original texts and their translations from the beginnings in the mid-fifties of the last century to the present. Until the first decade of the present century, excerption was done manually, which limited the research to a small number of samples. The early studies of English largely concentrated on sentence condensation and nominal tendencies in the expression of the predicate, as compared with the verbal character of Czech. In connection with the development of the theory of functional sentence perspective other topics were found in this sphere, especially as regards word order. While the former studies can be currently pursued on the basis of InterCorp at a qualitatively higher level, research into FSP topics remains restricted to issues involving variables with formalizable realization forms. The main part of the paper focuses on some of the fallacies involved in using translation counterparts as the basis of contrastive research. One of them is the possible influence of the original; others appear in such areas as the choice of translation counterparts with respect to the issue under investigation, the assessment of their adequacy, including the possibility of misrepresentation by the translator, the validity of the translation counterpart (which is in most cases limited, as alternatives are possible) and others.