Miloš Urban kontra literární kritika
Miloš Urban versus literary reviewers
bachelor thesis (DEFENDED)

View/ Open
Permanent link
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11956/9001Identifiers
Study Information System: 2486
Collections
- Kvalifikační práce [18431]
Author
Advisor
Referee
Halada, Jan
Faculty / Institute
Faculty of Social Sciences
Discipline
Journalism
Department
Department of Journalism
Date of defense
29. 1. 2007
Publisher
Univerzita Karlova, Fakulta sociálních vědLanguage
Czech
Grade
Excellent
Bakalářská práce sleduje vývoj tvorby českého prozaika Miloše Urbana a analyzuje její mediální reflexi v českých periodikách. Konkrétním předmětem analýzy byla proměna přístupu české literární kritiky k Urbanovi jako k začínajícímu autorovi, jenž si zasluhuje kladnou publicitu, a k Urbanovi, který již nadstandardní publicitu a prodejnost má. Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
The bachelor thesis analyze works of contemporary czech prose-writer Miloš Urban and response of literary critics to Urban's novels. The papers are focused on three novels, in particular: Sedmikostelí (1999), Stín katedrály (2003) and Santiniho jazyk (2005). Gothic and gothic-baroque architecture play essential role in all of them, so they are defined as "architectural trilogy". The thesis distinguish two components of Urbans postmodern novels: high-art and low-art. The aim of the study is to analyze both of them. The high-art component of Urban's novels is a dualism of racionality and iracionaility, modern and traditional society. The low-art component of his work is a brutality, a violence and homicedes. Two central reviewers hypotheses are presented and discussed: a) the philosophy of Urban's novels is just a postmodern mystification, b) the fuction of the low-art component is taken from horror and detective stories. Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)