The Problem of Intentionality in the Contemporary Visual Arts
Vědecký článek
View/ Open
Permanent link
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11956/111198Identifiers
Collections
- Číslo 2 [7]
Author
Issue Date
2019Publisher
Univerzita Karlova, Filozofická fakultaSource document
Estetika: The Central European Journal of Aesthetics (web)ISSN: 2571-0915
Periodical publication year: 2019
Periodical Volume: 2019
Periodical Issue: 2
Link to license terms
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/Keywords (English)
intentionalism, interpretation, art (philosophy of), aesthetic judgementThe discourse regarding intentionality and interpretation in analytic philosophy of art,
although ample and lively, has concerned itself almost exclusively with the literary
medium. Starting from a paper published by Hans Maes, I discuss the complications that
may arise in straightforwardly applying current intentionalist strategies to the realm of
the contemporary visual arts. I first present a detailed account of the difference
between hypothetical intentionalism and moderate actual intentionalism which will help
to better understand the nature of Maes’s arguments in his paper. I then argue that
the characteristics which shape the approach of moderate actual intentionalism cannot
be accommodated by certain contemporary visual artworks. I will demonstrate how in
certain contemporary artworks, should a viewer be interested in accepting actual
intentions within her interpretation, she will have to do so with an extreme intentionalist
posture rather than a moderate actual one.