Zobrazit minimální záznam

dc.contributorBajer, Aleš
dc.contributorBrůna, Vladimír
dc.contributorBárta, Miroslav
dc.contributorVaradzinová Suková, Lenka
dc.creatorLisá, Lenka
dc.date
dc.date
dc.date
dc.date
dc.date2015
dc.date
dc.date
dc.date
dc.date
dc.date.accessioned2018-05-28T11:04:43Z
dc.date.available2018-05-28T11:04:43Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifierISSN 1801-3899
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11956/96749
dc.description
dc.description
dc.descriptionThe main aim of this paper is to show how detailed knowl - edge of the recent landscape may help us to identify formation processes in the context of archaeological localities. The research area used in this paper as a case study is called Usli and is located close to the Fourth Nile Cataract. Since 2009 this site has been one of the conces sions explored by the Czech Institute of Egyptology (Faculty of Arts, Charles University in Prague). Close to the site, composed of a complex of temples and palatial and other buildings dated mostly to the Napatan Period (ca. 795–350 B.C.), there is an abandoned modern village, originally built using traditional techniques and building materials. It is possible to recognise clearly how the walls and houses slowly decay and what type of anthropogenic sediment comes to being in consequence of these processes. In the present paper, the sedimentary records described at the archaeological site are compared with the subrecent sedimentary records found in the abandoned village. Additionally, anthropogenic features noted within the abandoned village are discussed in the context of the possible archaeological record.
dc.formatpdf
dc.format
dc.format
dc.publisherUniverzita Karlova v Praze, Filozofická fakulta
dc.relation
dc.relation
dc.relation
dc.relation
dc.relation
dc.relation
dc.relation
dc.relation
dc.relation
dc.relation
dc.relation
dc.relation
dc.relation
dc.relation
dc.rights
dc.rights
dc.rightshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/
dc.sourcePražské egyptologické studie (Prague Egyptological Studies), 2015, 14, 115-120
dc.subjectSudan
dc.subjectUsli
dc.subjectarchaeology
dc.subjectarchaeologization
dc.subjectanthropogenic
dc.subjectsediment
dc.subjectsedimentary record
dc.subjectformation process
dc.subjectSúdán
dc.subjectarcheologie
dc.subjectarcheologizace
dc.subjectantropogenní
dc.subjectsediment
dc.subjectsedimentární záznam
dc.subjectformační proces
dc.titleArcheologie versus archeologizace: příkladová studie Usli, Súdán
dc.titleArchaeology versus archaeologization: a case study from Usli, Sudan
dc.title
dc.typetext
dc.typeČlánekcs_CZ
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.coverage
dc.coverage
dc.coverage
uk.internal-typeuk_publication
dc.description.startPage115
dc.description.endPage120
dcterms.isPartOf.namePražské egyptologické studie (Prague Egyptological Studies)cs_CZ
dcterms.isPartOf.journalYear2015
dcterms.isPartOf.journalVolume2015
dcterms.isPartOf.journalIssue14


Soubory tohoto záznamu

Thumbnail

Tento záznam se objevuje v následujících sbírkách

Zobrazit minimální záznam


© 2017 Univerzita Karlova, Ústřední knihovna, Ovocný trh 560/5, 116 36 Praha 1; email: admin-repozitar [at] cuni.cz

Za dodržení všech ustanovení autorského zákona jsou zodpovědné jednotlivé složky Univerzity Karlovy. / Each constituent part of Charles University is responsible for adherence to all provisions of the copyright law.

Upozornění / Notice: Získané informace nemohou být použity k výdělečným účelům nebo vydávány za studijní, vědeckou nebo jinou tvůrčí činnost jiné osoby než autora. / Any retrieved information shall not be used for any commercial purposes or claimed as results of studying, scientific or any other creative activities of any person other than the author.

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
Theme by 
@mire NV