Aesthetic Disagreement with Oneself as Another
dc.contributor.author | Tooming, Uku | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-09-25T15:07:07Z | |
dc.date.available | 2023-09-25T15:07:07Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2023-09-14 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11956/183944 | |
dc.description.abstract | Can disagreement with my past self about aesthetic matters give a reason to reconsider my present aesthetic verdict and if it does, under what conditions? In other words, can such a disagreement be a sign of my failing in my present aesthetic judgement? In this paper, I argue that revising one’s judgement in response to disagreeing with one’s former self is appropriate but only when the former and the present self share the same aesthetic personality. The possibility of failure in one’s aesthetic judgement is therefore bound up, among other things, with facts about one’s aesthetic identity over time. The resulting view has implications for our understanding of the scope of the autonomy in aesthetics and is consistent with empirical evidence regarding the way in which people evaluate aesthetic judgments. | en |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.publisher | Univerzita Karlova, Filozofická fakulta | cs |
dc.publisher | Helsinki University Press | en |
dc.rights | This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of theCreative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. | en |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | |
dc.source.uri | https://estetikajournal.org | |
dc.subject | aesthetic judgement | en |
dc.subject | aesthetic disagreement | en |
dc.subject | aesthetic personality | en |
dc.subject | autonomy | en |
dc.subject | personal identity | en |
dc.title | Aesthetic Disagreement with Oneself as Another | en |
dc.type | Vědecký článek | cs |
uk.abstract.en | Can disagreement with my past self about aesthetic matters give a reason to reconsider my present aesthetic verdict and if it does, under what conditions? In other words, can such a disagreement be a sign of my failing in my present aesthetic judgement? In this paper, I argue that revising one’s judgement in response to disagreeing with one’s former self is appropriate but only when the former and the present self share the same aesthetic personality. The possibility of failure in one’s aesthetic judgement is therefore bound up, among other things, with facts about one’s aesthetic identity over time. The resulting view has implications for our understanding of the scope of the autonomy in aesthetics and is consistent with empirical evidence regarding the way in which people evaluate aesthetic judgments. | en |
dc.publisher.publicationPlace | Helsinki | en |
dc.publisher.publicationPlace | Praha | cs |
uk.internal-type | uk_publication | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.33134/eeja.369 | |
dc.description.startPage | 145 | |
dc.description.endPage | 161 | |
dcterms.isPartOf.name | Estetika: The European Journal of Aesthetics | en |
dcterms.isPartOf.journalYear | 2023 | |
dcterms.isPartOf.journalVolume | 2023 | |
dcterms.isPartOf.journalIssue | 2 | |
dcterms.isPartOf.eissn | 2571-0915 |
Soubory tohoto záznamu
Tento záznam se objevuje v následujících sbírkách
-
Číslo 2 [7]
Issue 2
Kromě případů, kde je uvedeno jinak, licence tohoto záznamu je This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of theCreative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use,
distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.