Interpretive Authenticity: Performances, Versions, and Ontology
dc.contributor.author | Puy, Nemesio G. C. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-09-25T14:44:02Z | |
dc.date.available | 2023-09-25T14:44:02Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2022-09-15 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11956/183930 | |
dc.description.abstract | Julian Dodd defends the view that, in musical work-performance practice, interpretive authenticity is a more fundamental value than score compliance authenticity. According to him, compliance with a work’s score can be sacrificed in cases where it conflicts with interpretative authenticity. Stephen Davies and Andrew Kania reject this view, arguing that, if a performer intentionally departs from a work’s score, she is not properly instantiating that work and hence not producing an authentic performance of it. I argue that this objection fails. A detailed analysis of work-performance practice reveals, first, that the normative scope of interpretive authenticity encompasses the practice of composing musical versions and that, second, when performers sacrifice score compliance to maximize interpretive authenticity, they are performing the target work by means of performing a version of it. By means of the nested types theory, I then show how performances produced in this way can be properly formed instances, and hence authentic performances, of their target work. | en |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.publisher | Univerzita Karlova, Filozofická fakulta | cs |
dc.publisher | Helsinki University Press | en |
dc.rights | This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of theCreative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. | en |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | |
dc.source.uri | https://estetikajournal.org | |
dc.subject | musical works | en |
dc.subject | performances | en |
dc.subject | authenticity | en |
dc.subject | ontology of music | en |
dc.subject | normativity | en |
dc.title | Interpretive Authenticity: Performances, Versions, and Ontology | en |
dc.type | Vědecký článek | cs |
uk.abstract.en | Julian Dodd defends the view that, in musical work-performance practice, interpretive authenticity is a more fundamental value than score compliance authenticity. According to him, compliance with a work’s score can be sacrificed in cases where it conflicts with interpretative authenticity. Stephen Davies and Andrew Kania reject this view, arguing that, if a performer intentionally departs from a work’s score, she is not properly instantiating that work and hence not producing an authentic performance of it. I argue that this objection fails. A detailed analysis of work-performance practice reveals, first, that the normative scope of interpretive authenticity encompasses the practice of composing musical versions and that, second, when performers sacrifice score compliance to maximize interpretive authenticity, they are performing the target work by means of performing a version of it. By means of the nested types theory, I then show how performances produced in this way can be properly formed instances, and hence authentic performances, of their target work. | en |
dc.publisher.publicationPlace | Helsinki | en |
dc.publisher.publicationPlace | Praha | cs |
uk.internal-type | uk_publication | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.33134/eeja.327 | |
dc.description.startPage | 135 | |
dc.description.endPage | 152 | |
dcterms.isPartOf.name | Estetika: The European Journal of Aesthetics | |
dcterms.isPartOf.journalYear | 2022 | |
dcterms.isPartOf.journalVolume | 2022 | |
dcterms.isPartOf.journalIssue | 2 | |
dcterms.isPartOf.eissn | 2571-0915 |
Soubory tohoto záznamu
Tento záznam se objevuje v následujících sbírkách
-
Číslo 2 [7]
Issue 2
Kromě případů, kde je uvedeno jinak, licence tohoto záznamu je This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of theCreative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use,
distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.