A Heretical Defence of the Unity of Form and Content

Glavaničová, Daniela

dc.contributor.author	Glavaničová, Daniela
dc.date.accessioned	2023-09-25T14:31:12Z
dc.date.available	2023-09-25T14:31:12Z
dc.date.issued	2022-03-15
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11956/183922
dc.description.abstract	The received view in the debate on the form–content unity of poetry is that the possibility of paraphrase does not sit well with the unity conception. I will suggest a shift from paraphrase to translation, since the latter is substantially closer to the heart of the matter. I will heretically divert from the ‘commonplace’ view, which claims that poetry cannot be translated. However, I will argue that the possibility of translation in this sense can be reconciled, appearances notwithstanding, with the unity of form and content. A further surprising conclusion will be that, while this possibility prima facie appears to be the best argument against the unity, the contrary is the case.	en
dc.language.iso	en
dc.publisher	Univerzita Karlova, Filozofická fakulta	cs
dc.publisher	Helsinki University Press	en
dc.rights	This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of theCreative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.	en
dc.rights.uri	http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.source.uri	https://estetikajournal.org
dc.subject	heresy	en
dc.subject	paraphrase	en
dc.subject	philosophy of poetry	en
dc.subject	translation	en
dc.subject	unity of form and content	en
dc.title	A Heretical Defence of the Unity of Form and Content	en
dc.type	Vědecký článek	cs
uk.abstract.en	The received view in the debate on the form–content unity of poetry is that the possibility of paraphrase does not sit well with the unity conception. I will suggest a shift from paraphrase to translation, since the latter is substantially closer to the heart of the matter. I will heretically divert from the ‘commonplace’ view, which claims that poetry cannot be translated. However, I will argue that the possibility of translation in this sense can be reconciled, appearances notwithstanding, with the unity of form and content. A further surprising conclusion will be that, while this possibility prima facie appears to be the best argument against the unity, the contrary is the case.	en
dc.publisher.publicationPlace	Helsinki	en
dc.publisher.publicationPlace	Praha	cs
uk.internal-type	uk_publication
dc.identifier.doi	10.33134/eeja.207
dc.description.startPage	33
dc.description.endPage	47
dcterms.isPartOf.name	Estetika: The European Journal of Aesthetics	en
dcterms.isPartOf.journalYear	2022
dcterms.isPartOf.journalVolume	2022
dcterms.isPartOf.journalIssue	1
dcterms.isPartOf.eissn	2571-0915

Soubory tohoto záznamu

Název:: 207-1-1504-1-10-20220315.pdf
Velikost:: 727.3Kb
Formát:: application/pdf

Zobrazit/otevřít

Tento záznam se objevuje v následujících sbírkách

Číslo 1 [7]
Issue 1

Zobrazit minimální záznam

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of theCreative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use,
distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Kromě případů, kde je uvedeno jinak, licence tohoto záznamu je This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of theCreative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.