Zobrazit minimální záznam

dc.contributor.authorCalabi, Clotilde
dc.contributor.authorHuemer, Wolfgang
dc.contributor.authorSantambrogio, Marco
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-25T14:29:46Z
dc.date.available2023-09-25T14:29:46Z
dc.date.issued2022-03-15
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11956/183921
dc.description.abstractWhat do we see in a mirror? There is an ongoing debate over whether mirrors present us with images of objects or whether we see, through the mirror, the objects themselves. Roberto Casati has recently argued that there is a categorical difference between images and mirror reflections. His argument depends on the observation that mirrors, but not paintings, are sensitive to changes in the observer’s perspective. In our paper we scrutinize Casati’s argument and present a modal argument that shows that it cannot establish this conclusion. We suggest that Casati’s line of reasoning suffers from the fact that he does not take dynamic images – that is, images that change over time – into account.en
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherUniverzita Karlova, Filozofická fakultacs
dc.publisherHelsinki University Pressen
dc.rightsThis is an open-access article distributed under the terms of theCreative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.en
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.source.urihttps://estetikajournal.org
dc.subjectmirror imagesen
dc.subjectpictorial representationen
dc.subjectperspectiveen
dc.subjectdynamic imagesen
dc.subjectBrunelleschi’s experimenten
dc.titleMirrors, Windows, and Paintingsen
dc.typeVědecký článekcs
uk.abstract.enWhat do we see in a mirror? There is an ongoing debate over whether mirrors present us with images of objects or whether we see, through the mirror, the objects themselves. Roberto Casati has recently argued that there is a categorical difference between images and mirror reflections. His argument depends on the observation that mirrors, but not paintings, are sensitive to changes in the observer’s perspective. In our paper we scrutinize Casati’s argument and present a modal argument that shows that it cannot establish this conclusion. We suggest that Casati’s line of reasoning suffers from the fact that he does not take dynamic images – that is, images that change over time – into account.en
dc.publisher.publicationPlaceHelsinkien
dc.publisher.publicationPlacePrahacs
uk.internal-typeuk_publication
dc.identifier.doi10.33134/eeja.200
dc.description.startPage22
dc.description.endPage32
dcterms.isPartOf.nameEstetika: The European Journal of Aestheticsen
dcterms.isPartOf.journalYear2022
dcterms.isPartOf.journalVolume2022
dcterms.isPartOf.journalIssue1
dcterms.isPartOf.eissn2571-0915


Soubory tohoto záznamu

Thumbnail

Tento záznam se objevuje v následujících sbírkách

Zobrazit minimální záznam

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of theCreative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use,
distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Kromě případů, kde je uvedeno jinak, licence tohoto záznamu je This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of theCreative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

© 2017 Univerzita Karlova, Ústřední knihovna, Ovocný trh 560/5, 116 36 Praha 1; email: admin-repozitar [at] cuni.cz

Za dodržení všech ustanovení autorského zákona jsou zodpovědné jednotlivé složky Univerzity Karlovy. / Each constituent part of Charles University is responsible for adherence to all provisions of the copyright law.

Upozornění / Notice: Získané informace nemohou být použity k výdělečným účelům nebo vydávány za studijní, vědeckou nebo jinou tvůrčí činnost jiné osoby než autora. / Any retrieved information shall not be used for any commercial purposes or claimed as results of studying, scientific or any other creative activities of any person other than the author.

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
Theme by 
@mire NV