Zobrazit minimální záznam

dc.contributor.authorHu, Xiaoyan
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-25T14:15:34Z
dc.date.available2023-09-25T14:15:34Z
dc.date.issued2021-09-16
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11956/183915
dc.description.abstractIn this paper, I suggest that the notion of qiyun (qi: spirit; yun: consonance) in the context of landscape painting involves a moral dimension. The Confucian doctrine of sincerity involved in bringing the landscapist’s or audience’s mind in accord with the Dao underpins the moral dimension of spiritual communion between artist, object, audience, and work. By projecting Kant’s and Schiller’s conceptions of aesthetic autonomy and the moral relevance of art onto the qiyun-focused context, we see that the reflection on parallels and differences between the two cultural traditions helps to better understand the moral dimension of qiyun aesthetics.en
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherHelsinki University Pressen
dc.publisherUniverzita Karlova, Filozofická fakultacs
dc.rightsThis is an open-access article distributed under the terms of theCreative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.en
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.source.urihttps://estetikajournal.org
dc.subjectQiyunen
dc.subjectshenhui (spiritual communion)en
dc.subjectConfucian doctrine of sincerityen
dc.subjectmoral relevance of arten
dc.subjectKanten
dc.subjectSchilleren
dc.titleThe Moral Dimension of Qiyun Aesthetics and Some Resonances with Kant and Schilleren
dc.typeVědecký článekcs
uk.abstract.enIn this paper, I suggest that the notion of qiyun (qi: spirit; yun: consonance) in the context of landscape painting involves a moral dimension. The Confucian doctrine of sincerity involved in bringing the landscapist’s or audience’s mind in accord with the Dao underpins the moral dimension of spiritual communion between artist, object, audience, and work. By projecting Kant’s and Schiller’s conceptions of aesthetic autonomy and the moral relevance of art onto the qiyun-focused context, we see that the reflection on parallels and differences between the two cultural traditions helps to better understand the moral dimension of qiyun aesthetics.en
dc.publisher.publicationPlacePrahacs
dc.publisher.publicationPlaceHelsinkien
uk.internal-typeuk_publication
dc.identifier.doi10.33134/eeja.230
dc.description.startPage129
dc.description.endPage143
dcterms.isPartOf.nameEstetika: The European Journal of Aestheticsen
dcterms.isPartOf.journalYear2021
dcterms.isPartOf.journalVolume2021
dcterms.isPartOf.journalIssue2
dcterms.isPartOf.eissn2571-0915


Soubory tohoto záznamu

Thumbnail

Tento záznam se objevuje v následujících sbírkách

Zobrazit minimální záznam

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of theCreative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use,
distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Kromě případů, kde je uvedeno jinak, licence tohoto záznamu je This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of theCreative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

© 2017 Univerzita Karlova, Ústřední knihovna, Ovocný trh 560/5, 116 36 Praha 1; email: admin-repozitar [at] cuni.cz

Za dodržení všech ustanovení autorského zákona jsou zodpovědné jednotlivé složky Univerzity Karlovy. / Each constituent part of Charles University is responsible for adherence to all provisions of the copyright law.

Upozornění / Notice: Získané informace nemohou být použity k výdělečným účelům nebo vydávány za studijní, vědeckou nebo jinou tvůrčí činnost jiné osoby než autora. / Any retrieved information shall not be used for any commercial purposes or claimed as results of studying, scientific or any other creative activities of any person other than the author.

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
Theme by 
@mire NV