Zobrazit minimální záznam

dc.contributor.authorČervenková, Adéla
dc.date.accessioned2021-12-15T08:41:22Z
dc.date.available2021-12-15T08:41:22Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11956/170723
dc.language.isoencs
dc.publisherUniverzita Karlova, Filozofická fakultacs
dc.subjectconversation analysiscs
dc.subjectpair and group workcs
dc.subjectrepaircs
dc.subjectnegotiating meaningcs
dc.subjectonline dictionarycs
dc.subjectepistemicscs
dc.subjectexpertcs
dc.subjectnovicecs
dc.title“I’ll google it.”: Using an Online Dictionary for Conducting Repair during Pair and Group Work Activities in Upper-Secondary EFL Classroomscs
dc.typeVědecký článekcs
dcterms.accessRightsopenAccess
dcterms.licensehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/
uk.abstract.enPair and group work activities break the traditional teacher-centred structures of interaction and partly transfer the control of the teacher to the students, who are provided with more freedom in turn-taking and the management of activities. In the study of how students learn the target language, pair and group work repair sequences are particularly important in order to understand how the participants repair the breakdowns in communication and what processes for acquiring a foreign language they use. This study explores the different ways that students conduct conversational repair, i.e. negotiation of meaning, during pair and group work. Specifically, focusing on the sequences when a dictionary was consulted, this conversation-analytic study examines how the students incorporate the dictionary in those sequences and how its possible presence might influence the roles of experts and novices in the interaction, which gives insight into the epistemic dynamics in learner–learner interactions. The data used for this study consist of carefully synchronized audio and video recordings of students from five different Czech upper-secondary schools in their final year of studies during three to five consecutive EFL lessons. One of the central findings is that the students often try to conduct the repair through different means and the dictionary is used later in the interaction, which could indicate that the use of a dictionary is viewed as a last resort to check the meaning with the dictionary entry, as well as a tool to strengthen and/or weaken the epistemic roles of the participants.cs
dc.publisher.publicationPlacePrahacs
uk.internal-typeuk_publication
dc.description.startPage43cs
dc.description.endPage58cs
dcterms.isPartOf.nameStudie z aplikované lingvistikycs
dcterms.isPartOf.journalYear2021
dcterms.isPartOf.journalVolume2021
dcterms.isPartOf.journalIssue2
dcterms.isPartOf.issn2336-6702
dc.relation.isPartOfUrlhttps://studiezaplikovanelingvistiky.ff.cuni.cz


Soubory tohoto záznamu

Thumbnail

Tento záznam se objevuje v následujících sbírkách

Zobrazit minimální záznam


© 2017 Univerzita Karlova, Ústřední knihovna, Ovocný trh 560/5, 116 36 Praha 1; email: admin-repozitar [at] cuni.cz

Za dodržení všech ustanovení autorského zákona jsou zodpovědné jednotlivé složky Univerzity Karlovy. / Each constituent part of Charles University is responsible for adherence to all provisions of the copyright law.

Upozornění / Notice: Získané informace nemohou být použity k výdělečným účelům nebo vydávány za studijní, vědeckou nebo jinou tvůrčí činnost jiné osoby než autora. / Any retrieved information shall not be used for any commercial purposes or claimed as results of studying, scientific or any other creative activities of any person other than the author.

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
Theme by 
@mire NV