4′33′′, Ideas, and Medium in Appreciating Conceptual Art
| dc.contributor.author | Šterbáková, Daniela | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-07-02T06:33:07Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2021-07-02T06:33:07Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2021-03-17 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11956/126660 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.publisher | Helsinki University Press | en_US |
| dc.publisher | Univerzita Karlova, Filozofická fakulta | cs_CZ |
| dc.rights | This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of theCreative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. | en_US |
| dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | |
| dc.source.uri | https://estetikajournal.org | |
| dc.subject | conceptual art | en |
| dc.subject | performance art | en |
| dc.subject | gesture | en |
| dc.subject | silence | en |
| dc.subject | Cage | en |
| dc.title | 4′33′′, Ideas, and Medium in Appreciating Conceptual Art | en |
| dc.type | Vědecký článek | cs |
| uk.abstract.en | How does John Cage’s conceptual work 4′33′′ communicate its meaning and how can we appreciate it? In this paper, I develop two competing interpretations to tackle these questions. First, drawing on Peter Goldie and Elisabeth Schellekens’s account of conceptual art (‘conceptualism’) and on Cage’s commentary on 4′33′′, I elaborate an overlooked idea that the work creates a new art form of conceptual music, which can be appreciated exclusively through the ideas it conveys. However, I argue that the conceptualist interpretation of 4′33′′ does not help us understand the work’s point, because it reveals a set of inconsistent claims about music and listening. The second interpretation draws on Julian Dodd’s view that the physical medium is irreducible in appreciating conceptual artworks (‘experientialism’). I develop this view by introducing a notion of a gesture to expand on how the performance of 4′33′′ contributes to its aesthetic appreciation and propose an alternative interpretation of the work’s meaning. | cs |
| uk.internal-type | uk_publication | |
| dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.33134/eeja.253 | |
| dc.identifier.eissn | 2571-0915 | |
| dc.description.startPage | 57 | |
| dc.description.endPage | 71 | |
| dcterms.isPartOf.name | Estetika: The European Journal of Aesthetics | |
| dcterms.isPartOf.journalYear | 2021 | |
| dcterms.isPartOf.journalVolume | 2021 | |
| dcterms.isPartOf.journalIssue | 1 |
Soubory tohoto záznamu
Tento záznam se objevuje v následujících sbírkách
-
Číslo 1 [7]
Issue 1
Kromě případů, kde je uvedeno jinak, licence tohoto záznamu je This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of theCreative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use,
distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.