The Emergence of Wittgenstein’s Views on Aesthetics in the 1933 Lectures
| dc.contributor.author | Schroeder, Severin | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-07-01T13:38:58Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2021-07-01T13:38:58Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2020-04-15 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11956/126640 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.publisher | Helsinki University Press | en_US |
| dc.publisher | Univerzita Karlova, Filozofická fakulta | cs_CZ |
| dc.rights | This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of theCreative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. | en_US |
| dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | |
| dc.source.uri | https://estetikajournal.org | |
| dc.subject | Wittgenstein | en |
| dc.subject | beautiful | en |
| dc.subject | aesthetic judgement | en |
| dc.subject | 1933 lectures | en |
| dc.subject | good | en |
| dc.subject | ethics | en |
| dc.title | The Emergence of Wittgenstein’s Views on Aesthetics in the 1933 Lectures | en |
| dc.type | Vědecký článek | cs |
| uk.abstract.en | In this paper I offer a genetic account of how Wittgenstein developed his ideas on aesthetics in his 1933 lectures. He argued that the word ‘beautiful’ is neither the name of a particular perceptible quality, nor the name of whatever produces a certain psychological effect, and unlike ‘good’, it does not stand for a family-resemblance concept either. Rather, the word ‘beautiful’ has different meanings in different contexts as we apply it according to different criteria. However, in more advanced regions of aesthetics the word ‘beautiful’ ceases to play an important role. Instead, we judge things to be more or less correct according to genre-specific standards or criteria, which in an aesthetic discussion are presupposed, rather than argued for. Finally, Wittgenstein came to realise that providing support for an aesthetic appraisal according to some given criteria is not the only and perhaps not even the main focus of aesthetic discussion. More interesting to him became the idea of a puzzle or perplexity in aesthetics, which he discussed in greater detail in his 1938 lectures. | cs |
| uk.internal-type | uk_publication | |
| dc.identifier.doi | http://doi.org/10.33134/eeja.25 | |
| dc.identifier.eissn | 2571-0915 | |
| dc.description.startPage | 5 | |
| dc.description.endPage | 14 | |
| dcterms.isPartOf.name | Estetika: The European Journal of Aesthetics | |
| dcterms.isPartOf.journalYear | 2020 | |
| dcterms.isPartOf.journalVolume | 2020 | |
| dcterms.isPartOf.journalIssue | 1 |
Soubory tohoto záznamu
Tento záznam se objevuje v následujících sbírkách
-
Číslo 1 [9]
Issue 1
Kromě případů, kde je uvedeno jinak, licence tohoto záznamu je This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of theCreative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use,
distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.