Wittgenstein and Heidegger against a Science of Aesthetics
| dc.contributor.author | Vrahimis, Andreas | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-07-01T13:38:23Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2021-07-01T13:38:23Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2020-04-15 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11956/126635 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.publisher | Helsinki University Press | en_US |
| dc.publisher | Univerzita Karlova, Filozofická fakulta | cs_CZ |
| dc.rights | This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of theCreative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. | en_US |
| dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | |
| dc.source.uri | https://estetikajournal.org | |
| dc.subject | Wittgenstein | en |
| dc.subject | Heidegger | en |
| dc.subject | Brentano | en |
| dc.subject | Nietzsche | en |
| dc.subject | scientism | en |
| dc.subject | psychologism | en |
| dc.title | Wittgenstein and Heidegger against a Science of Aesthetics | en |
| dc.type | Vědecký článek | cs |
| uk.abstract.en | Wittgenstein’s and Heidegger’s objections against the possibility of a science of aesthetics were influential on different sides of the analytic/continental divide. Heidegger’s anti-scientism leads him to an alētheic view of artworks which precedes and exceeds any possible aesthetic reduction. Wittgenstein also rejects the relevance of causal explanations, psychological or physiological, to aesthetic questions. The main aim of this paper is to compare Heidegger with Wittgenstein, showing that: (a) there are significant parallels to be drawn between Wittgenstein’s and Heidegger’s anti-scientism about aesthetics, and that (b) their anti-scientism leads both towards partly divergent criticisms of what I will call ‘aestheticism’. The divergence is mainly due to a broader metaphilosophical disagreement concerning appeals to ordinary language. Thus situating the two philosophers’ positions facilitates a possible critical dialogue between analytic and continental approaches in aesthetics. | cs |
| uk.internal-type | uk_publication | |
| dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.33134/eeja.29 | |
| dc.identifier.eissn | 2571-0915 | |
| dc.description.startPage | 64 | |
| dc.description.endPage | 85 | |
| dcterms.isPartOf.name | Estetika: The European Journal of Aesthetics | |
| dcterms.isPartOf.journalYear | 2020 | |
| dcterms.isPartOf.journalVolume | 2020 | |
| dcterms.isPartOf.journalIssue | 1 |
Soubory tohoto záznamu
Tento záznam se objevuje v následujících sbírkách
-
Číslo 1 [9]
Issue 1
Kromě případů, kde je uvedeno jinak, licence tohoto záznamu je This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of theCreative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use,
distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.