Zobrazit minimální záznam

Theatrology in the time of Prior
dc.contributor.authorTopolová, Barbara
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-09T11:42:56Z
dc.date.available2021-02-09T11:42:56Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.issn2336-6680
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11956/124295
dc.language.isocs_CZcs_CZ
dc.publisherUniverzita Karlova, Filozofická fakultacs_CZ
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/
dc.sourceSlovo a smysl, 2020, 35, 123-138cs_CZ
dc.source.urihttps://wordandsense.ff.cuni.cz
dc.subjectSamizdatcs_CZ
dc.subjectčasopis Dialogcs_CZ
dc.subjectteatrologiecs_CZ
dc.subjectdivadelní scénacs_CZ
dc.subjectdivadelní kritikacs_CZ
dc.subject70. léta 20. stoletícs_CZ
dc.titleTeatrologie v čase Priorůcs_CZ
dc.typePříspěvek v periodikucs_CZ
dc.title.translatedTheatrology in the time of Priorcs_CZ
uk.abstract.enThis study analyzes the publication of the samizdat magazine Dialog, which offered a remarkably consistent and integrated diagnosis of contemporary Czech theatre in the 1970s. By identifying and critically reflecting on the theatre’s innumerable exceptional achievements and alternatives, against the background of its predominantly and unvaryingly average (and below average) offerings, the magazine searched for, formulated, and maintained the value criteria for both theatre criticism and the theatre arts. Despite the fact that after three years under trying circumstances the strength and resources of the editorial board and contributing authors were inevitably exhausted, the collection of texts presented by the magazine is undoubtedly one of the most relevant sources we have today on the theatre and productions of the period. The unsatisfactory state of other public professional critical platforms, as well as the many restrictions imposed on the daily press in the field of theatre arts, make the achievements of Dialog by comparison irreplaceable to historians today. In the broader context, the magazine can be seen as an attempt to distil the quintessence of the present through a cri tical reception of contemporary theatrical productions. A common leitmotif of Dialog, one that may be found in both its reviews and more comprehensive essays and studies, was an urgent expression of the inadequacy – or indeed the total absence – of stylistics in the theatre of its time. [*Obchodní domy Prior was a chain of state owned department stores in Normalisation era Czechoslovakia.]cs_CZ
dc.publisher.publicationPlacePrahacs_CZ
uk.internal-typeuk_publication
dc.identifier.doi10.14712/23366680.2020.3.9cs_CZ
dc.description.startPage123
dc.description.endPage138
dcterms.isPartOf.nameSlovo a smyslcs_CZ
dcterms.isPartOf.journalYear2020
dcterms.isPartOf.journalVolume2020
dcterms.isPartOf.journalIssue35


Soubory tohoto záznamu

Thumbnail

Tento záznam se objevuje v následujících sbírkách

Zobrazit minimální záznam

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/
Kromě případů, kde je uvedeno jinak, licence tohoto záznamu je http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/

© 2017 Univerzita Karlova, Ústřední knihovna, Ovocný trh 560/5, 116 36 Praha 1; email: admin-repozitar [at] cuni.cz

Za dodržení všech ustanovení autorského zákona jsou zodpovědné jednotlivé složky Univerzity Karlovy. / Each constituent part of Charles University is responsible for adherence to all provisions of the copyright law.

Upozornění / Notice: Získané informace nemohou být použity k výdělečným účelům nebo vydávány za studijní, vědeckou nebo jinou tvůrčí činnost jiné osoby než autora. / Any retrieved information shall not be used for any commercial purposes or claimed as results of studying, scientific or any other creative activities of any person other than the author.

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
Theme by 
@mire NV