Zobrazit minimální záznam

Self-help housing provision during late state socialism: responsibilisation, ideology and concrete
dc.contributor.authorHoření Samec, Tomáš
dc.contributor.authorBalgová, Ivana
dc.contributor.authorVacková, Barbora
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-09T08:55:00Z
dc.date.available2020-11-09T08:55:00Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.issn2336-6699
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11956/123136
dc.language.isocs_CZcs_CZ
dc.publisherUniverzita Karlova, Filozofická fakultacs_CZ
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/
dc.sourceStudia Ethnologica Pragensia, 2020, 1, 58-77cs_CZ
dc.source.urihttps://studiaethnologicapragensia.ff.cuni.cz
dc.subjectself-help housingcs_CZ
dc.subjectresponsibilitycs_CZ
dc.subjecthousingcs_CZ
dc.subjectstate socialismcs_CZ
dc.subjectideologycs_CZ
dc.titleSvépomocné bydlení v době pozdního státního socialismu: responsibilizace, ideologie a betoncs_CZ
dc.typeVědecký článekcs_CZ
dc.title.translatedSelf-help housing provision during late state socialism: responsibilisation, ideology and concretecs_CZ
uk.abstract.enSelf-help housing has been proposed as a solution to provide qualitatively adequate and affordable housing not only nowadays, but also during the late state socialism in the 1970s and 1980s in the former Czechoslovakia. In this article, we focus on how the self-help housing provision was during that era linked with the responsibilisation of households, a technique of governance usually associated with neoliberal regimes. On the case of self-help housing construction in town Myjava, which was supported by local authorities and initiated by local company eager to attract workers, we show then eventually main burden for management and risks steaming from the construction was carried by the individuals and their (extended) families. Seemingly the ideological contradiction of this individualistic solution was resolved through rigorous standardization of construction projects, which enabled to maintain a self-help housing as one of the regime’s tools for solving the housing question. We argue that in this respect, in the shift of responsibility from the formal institutions to the individuals, the housing system displays continuity between the late socialist and capitalist regimes, thus contributing to emerging body of literature which problematise the strict dichotomy between the socialist and capitalist eras.cs_CZ
dc.publisher.publicationPlacePrahacs_CZ
uk.internal-typeuk_publication
dc.description.startPage58
dc.description.endPage77
dcterms.isPartOf.nameStudia Ethnologica Pragensiacs_CZ
dcterms.isPartOf.journalYear2020
dcterms.isPartOf.journalVolume2020
dcterms.isPartOf.journalIssue1


Soubory tohoto záznamu

Thumbnail

Tento záznam se objevuje v následujících sbírkách

Zobrazit minimální záznam

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/
Kromě případů, kde je uvedeno jinak, licence tohoto záznamu je http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/

© 2017 Univerzita Karlova, Ústřední knihovna, Ovocný trh 560/5, 116 36 Praha 1; email: admin-repozitar [at] cuni.cz

Za dodržení všech ustanovení autorského zákona jsou zodpovědné jednotlivé složky Univerzity Karlovy. / Each constituent part of Charles University is responsible for adherence to all provisions of the copyright law.

Upozornění / Notice: Získané informace nemohou být použity k výdělečným účelům nebo vydávány za studijní, vědeckou nebo jinou tvůrčí činnost jiné osoby než autora. / Any retrieved information shall not be used for any commercial purposes or claimed as results of studying, scientific or any other creative activities of any person other than the author.

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
Theme by 
@mire NV