Zobrazit minimální záznam

dc.contributor.authorMiele, Matteo
dc.date.accessioned2020-01-09T11:44:42Z
dc.date.available2020-01-09T11:44:42Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.issn2336-7105
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11956/115740
dc.language.isoencs_CZ
dc.publisherUniverzita Karlova, Filozofická fakultacs_CZ
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/
dc.sourcePrague Papers on the History of International Relations, 2019, 1, 54-64cs_CZ
dc.source.urihttps://praguepapers.ff.cuni.cz
dc.subjectAfghanistancs_CZ
dc.subjectUnited Kingdomcs_CZ
dc.subjectChinacs_CZ
dc.subjectHsin-chiangcs_CZ
dc.subjectAmānallāhcs_CZ
dc.subjectRussiacs_CZ
dc.subjectBolshevikscs_CZ
dc.subjectGreat Gamecs_CZ
dc.titleHamlet in Kashgar: British Diplomacy and the 1920 Afghan Attempt to Establish Relations with the Republic of Chinacs_CZ
dc.typeVědecký článekcs_CZ
uk.abstract.enThe paper analyses the position of the British institutions, of the embassy in Peking and of the consulate general in Kashgar, before the attempt of the Afghan ruler Amānallāh to establish diplomatic relations with the Chinese Republic in 1920. Amānallāh, who ascended the throne of the emirate in 1919, rejected the British protectorate over Afghanistan and his victory in the Third Anglo-Afghan War certified the country’s full independence. The provisional nature of the 1919 Treaty of Rawalpindi, followed by the Anglo-Afghan Treaty of 1921, left many doubts still open about the international status of Afghanistan. Moreover, the proximity between Afghanistan and the Russian Bolsheviks introduced a further ideological element of difficulty in the geopolitical picture of Central Asia after the First World War. Central to the diplomatic dialectic was also the status of Afghan subjects in China, particularly in Hsin-chiang, and to whom their possible consular protection should be entrusted. The last part of the paper is dedicated precisely to the analysis of a specific case, the arrest of a man considered an Afghan by the Chinese, but subject of the princely state of Chitral according to the British. The case helped to better define the boundaries of the matter. The paper is essentially based on British archival sources.cs_CZ
uk.internal-typeuk_publication
dc.description.startPage54
dc.description.endPage64
dcterms.isPartOf.namePrague Papers on the History of International Relationscs_CZ
dcterms.isPartOf.journalYear2019
dcterms.isPartOf.journalVolume2019
dcterms.isPartOf.journalIssue1


Soubory tohoto záznamu

Thumbnail

Tento záznam se objevuje v následujících sbírkách

Zobrazit minimální záznam

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/
Kromě případů, kde je uvedeno jinak, licence tohoto záznamu je http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/

© 2017 Univerzita Karlova, Ústřední knihovna, Ovocný trh 560/5, 116 36 Praha 1; email: admin-repozitar [at] cuni.cz

Za dodržení všech ustanovení autorského zákona jsou zodpovědné jednotlivé složky Univerzity Karlovy. / Each constituent part of Charles University is responsible for adherence to all provisions of the copyright law.

Upozornění / Notice: Získané informace nemohou být použity k výdělečným účelům nebo vydávány za studijní, vědeckou nebo jinou tvůrčí činnost jiné osoby než autora. / Any retrieved information shall not be used for any commercial purposes or claimed as results of studying, scientific or any other creative activities of any person other than the author.

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
Theme by 
@mire NV