Zobrazit minimální záznam

Usage of the reflexive agent-demoting construction in 15th–17th-century Czech
dc.contributor.authorPergler, Jiří
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-28T15:02:20Z
dc.date.available2018-11-28T15:02:20Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.issn2336-6702
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11956/103952
dc.publisherUniverzita Karlova, Filozofická fakultacs_CZ
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/
dc.sourceStudie z aplikované lingvistiky - Studies in Applied Linguistics, 2018, 9, Special Issue, 85-105cs_CZ
dc.source.urihttps://studiezaplikovanelingvistiky.ff.cuni.cz
dc.subjectagent demotioncs_CZ
dc.subjectCzechcs_CZ
dc.subjectdiachronycs_CZ
dc.subjectreflexive agent-demoting constructioncs_CZ
dc.subjectreflexivitycs_CZ
dc.subjectsituation typecs_CZ
dc.subjectčeštinacs_CZ
dc.subjectdeagentizacecs_CZ
dc.subjectdiachroniecs_CZ
dc.subjectreflexivitacs_CZ
dc.subjectreflexivní deagentní konstrukcecs_CZ
dc.subjectsituační typcs_CZ
dc.titleK užívání reflexivní deagentní konstrukce v češtině 15.–17. stoletícs_CZ
dc.title.alternativeUsage of the reflexive agent-demoting construction in 15th–17th-century Czechcs_CZ
dc.typeVědecký článekcs_CZ
uk.abstract.enThis paper deals with the Czech reflexive agent-demoting construction (i.e. the construction in which the verb form contains the reflexive marker se and the agent is demoted from the subject position), more specifically, with the usage of this construction in 15th–17th century, a period when a notable increase of its frequency is documented in the literature. The aim is to identify the typical contexts (situation types) in which the construction was used and to describe their prototypical formal, semantic and pragmatic features with regard to the verb, its participants and the pattern as a whole. The situation types are divided into two groups: (1) the types typically expressing generalizations over eventualities with universal/generic agents, and (2) the types tending to express non-generalized eventualities with individual agents. The types in the first group include habituality, general truths, general (im)possibility, instructions, general modality of necessity and hypothetical circumstances; the second group contains metatexts, pragmatic indirectness, performatives, prominence of the patient and simple defocusing of the agent. The presented description can be used for comparing the functions of this construction with the situation in other diachronic periods, as well as with the distribution of other agent-demoting constructions which either coexisted or still coexist with the reflexive construction in Czech.cs_CZ
uk.internal-typeuk_publication
dc.description.startPage85
dc.description.endPage105
dcterms.isPartOf.nameStudie z aplikované lingvistiky - Studies in Applied Linguisticscs_CZ
dcterms.isPartOf.journalYear2018
dcterms.isPartOf.journalVolume9
dcterms.isPartOf.journalIssueSpecial Issue


Soubory tohoto záznamu

Thumbnail

Tento záznam se objevuje v následujících sbírkách

Zobrazit minimální záznam

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/
Kromě případů, kde je uvedeno jinak, licence tohoto záznamu je http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/

© 2017 Univerzita Karlova, Ústřední knihovna, Ovocný trh 560/5, 116 36 Praha 1; email: admin-repozitar [at] cuni.cz

Za dodržení všech ustanovení autorského zákona jsou zodpovědné jednotlivé složky Univerzity Karlovy. / Each constituent part of Charles University is responsible for adherence to all provisions of the copyright law.

Upozornění / Notice: Získané informace nemohou být použity k výdělečným účelům nebo vydávány za studijní, vědeckou nebo jinou tvůrčí činnost jiné osoby než autora. / Any retrieved information shall not be used for any commercial purposes or claimed as results of studying, scientific or any other creative activities of any person other than the author.

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
Theme by 
@mire NV