Zobrazit minimální záznam

Holy foolishness and bufoonery: two facets of carnival laughter in Russian culture
dc.contributor.authorJesaulov, Ivan Andrejevič
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-28T15:00:14Z
dc.date.available2018-11-28T15:00:14Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.issn2336–6729
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11956/103932
dc.publisherUniverzita Karlova, Filozofická fakultacs_CZ
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/
dc.sourceSvět literatury: Časopis pro novodobé literatury, 2018, 58, 21-28cs_CZ
dc.source.urihttps://svetliteratury.ff.cuni.cz
dc.subjectRussian literaturecs_CZ
dc.subjectcarnivalcs_CZ
dc.subjectparodycs_CZ
dc.subjectholy foolishnesscs_CZ
dc.subjectbuffoonerycs_CZ
dc.subjecttraditioncs_CZ
dc.subjectholinesscs_CZ
dc.subjectsincs_CZ
dc.subjectlawcs_CZ
dc.subjectgracecs_CZ
dc.subjectruská literaturacs_CZ
dc.subjectkarnevalcs_CZ
dc.subjectparodiecs_CZ
dc.subjectjurodivícs_CZ
dc.subjectklaunstvícs_CZ
dc.subjecttradicecs_CZ
dc.subjectsvatostcs_CZ
dc.subjecthříchcs_CZ
dc.subjectzákoncs_CZ
dc.subjectmilostcs_CZ
dc.titleJurodství a klaunství: Dvě tváře karnevalového smíchu v ruské kultuřecs_CZ
dc.title.alternativeHoly foolishness and bufoonery: two facets of carnival laughter in Russian culturecs_CZ
dc.typeVědecký článekcs_CZ
uk.abstract.enThe article revises the view that the concept of “carnival” (one of the main contributions of M. M. Bakhtin in humanities worldwide) can have a single ontological nature (either negative or positive). It argues for the necessity to differentiate within this “unofficial” area of culture — based on Russian material. Holy foolishness and buffoonery are kinds of ontological extremes of “serious-laughing” space of carnival. On the surface they are similar — as a parody of dominating world order norms. However, their “deviance” has different vectors in Russian tradition. While buffoonery in one way or another gravitates towards the area of “sin”, holy foolishness in Russian culture is related by those who represent it to the area of «holiness» one way or the other. In other words, while buffoonery indicates “unlawfulness” violating the “norms” of a generally accepted Law (even though this “violation” is always performed within certain boundaries, which are defined by Law itself), holy foolishness is a “supra lawful” cultural factor and gravitates towards another axiological extreme: Grace. In Russian literature, one should differentiate between the gravitation of authors towards either holy foolishness, or buffoonery, and in some cases one can talk about the contamination of holy foolishness and buffoonery.cs_CZ
uk.internal-typeuk_publication
dc.description.startPage21
dc.description.endPage28
dcterms.isPartOf.nameSvět literatury: Časopis pro novodobé literaturycs_CZ
dcterms.isPartOf.journalYear2018
dcterms.isPartOf.journalVolume2018
dcterms.isPartOf.journalIssue58


Soubory tohoto záznamu

No Thumbnail [100%x80]

Tento záznam se objevuje v následujících sbírkách

Zobrazit minimální záznam

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/
Kromě případů, kde je uvedeno jinak, licence tohoto záznamu je http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/

© 2017 Univerzita Karlova, Ústřední knihovna, Ovocný trh 560/5, 116 36 Praha 1; email: admin-repozitar [at] cuni.cz

Za dodržení všech ustanovení autorského zákona jsou zodpovědné jednotlivé složky Univerzity Karlovy. / Each constituent part of Charles University is responsible for adherence to all provisions of the copyright law.

Upozornění / Notice: Získané informace nemohou být použity k výdělečným účelům nebo vydávány za studijní, vědeckou nebo jinou tvůrčí činnost jiné osoby než autora. / Any retrieved information shall not be used for any commercial purposes or claimed as results of studying, scientific or any other creative activities of any person other than the author.

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
Theme by 
@mire NV